Search for Articles
Insight Newsletter

Edition 8 - February 2012 (3Mb)
Previous editions of Insight
Edition 7 - September 2011 (3Mb)
Insight Newsletter - Special Edition -
Financial Highlights 2010/11 (2Mb)
Edition 6 - June 2011 (1Mb)
Edition 5 - February 2011 (3Mb)
Edition 4 - November 2010 (2Mb)
Edition 3 - July 2010 (2Mb)
Edition 2 - March 2010 (2Mb)
Edition 1 - November 2009 (2Mb)
If you have any comments on Insight, please contact the editor:
01925 802343
Latest Articles
10 May 2012
Brokering events support £15million R&D investment
05 April 2012
Applause for nuclear skills achievements
01 March 2012
US and UK build on information exchange
29 February 2012
100th organisation commits to supply chain charter
13 February 2012
Year of opportunities in the nuclear sector
13 February 2012
Expect the unexpected
10 February 2012
Mix of old and new help save on pipeline project
10 February 2012
Ultimate aim is a concrete slab
10 February 2012
Spotlight on defuelling
10 February 2012
Oldest working reactor closes with a flourish
NDA publish initial feasibility study into spent fuel management options
15 November 2010
Our Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (RWMD) has produced a feasibility study exploring options for storage, transport and disposal of spent fuel from potential new nuclear power stations. This work was commissioned by the Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) working together with prospective new nuclear power station operators.
The work undertaken in these studies has identified that there are a number of feasible alternative options for the management of spent fuel from new nuclear power stations.
In the area of storage and packaging it has been established that there are a number of feasible potential centralised storage and packaging options and that both wet and dry technology is potentially suitable for the long term management of new nuclear power station spent fuel.
In the area of alternative cask types it has been established that the use of Multi-Purpose Containers (MPC), which could be used for storage, transport and disposal could reduce the handling of spent fuel assemblies and avoid concerns about handling aged spent fuel, but the implications of such a management approach for the spent fuel may warrant further investigation.
In the area of alternative disposal concept options it has been established that there are a number of feasible opportunities to better optimise the illustrative disposal concept examples currently examined, when spent fuel arising from new nuclear power stations is included in the disposal inventory. One of these relates to the cooling period, where RWMD has previously identified that for high burn-up SF (65 GW/tU) a cooling period of the order of 100 years is required to comply with the current bentonite buffer temperature limit of 100oC. This cooling period has been revisited and it has been identified, for example that with judicious mixing of long-cooled and short-cooled SF the duration of storage after the end of power station operation could be reduced to the order of 50 years before disposal.
It is envisaged that the information and understanding gained from these studies will inform future decision making.
The studies have necessarily been pitched at a high level and further work is needed to develop the options further before they could be used with confidence to inform deliberations on a potential revised planning basis for the new nuclear power station programme.
