Press Enquiries

For urgent enquiries out of office hours, please use the mobile phone numbers below:

National

Bill Hamilton
Head of Stakeholder
Relations
Office: 01925 802193
Mobile: 07816 315132
bill.hamilton@nda.gov.uk

Deborah Ward
Corporate Communications
Manager
Office: 01925 832280
Mobile: 07980 930838
deborah.ward@nda.gov.uk  

Cumbria

Matt Legg
Communications Manager - Cumbria
Office: 01925 802066
Mobile: 07748 777972
matthew.legg@nda.gov.uk

Dounreay

Anna MacConnell
Stakeholder Relations
Manager - Caithness
Office: 01925 802497
Mobile: 07889 117204
anna.macconnell@nda.gov.uk  

Other Sites

Jonathan Jenkin
Stakeholder Relations
Manager - Magnox
Office: 01925 832725
Mobile: 07970 746313
jonathan.jenkin@nda.gov.uk

Web Updates

Keep informed with the latest news and developments from the NDA

Web Updates

Keep informed with the latest news and developments from the NDA

.
Home > News and Events > Statement in response to Guardian Online Article  

Statement in response to Guardian Online Article

18 November 2008

Title: “Ed Miliband to exempt Sellafield firms from Freedom of Information Act” published on Monday 17 November 2008

The NDA would like to correct misunderstandings and inaccuracies reported in the above Guardian Online article.

Sellafield Ltd, the company carrying out decommissioning and operational work at the Sellafield and Capenhurst sites, will transfer to private sector ownership on 24 November 2008 following a two year competition. However, ownership of the sites will remain with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) which, as a Non-Departmental Public Body, continues to be subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

The article goes on to allege that “a decision by Malcolm Wicks, the former energy minister to make the taxpayer liable for any accidents at Sellafield exempting the firm from the national requirement to pay the first £140m of any bill for leaks or radiation contamination”. This is simply not the case. In addition to the Site Licence Company having insurance for the £140m mentioned in the article (and a requirement of the Nuclear Installations Act), through the competition for the ownership of the company each bidder was asked to nominate a monetary sum above the £140m that it would be responsible for in the unlikely event of an incident of this magnitude occurring. All the bidders including the winner – Nuclear Management Partners Ltd - offered to meet some of these potential costs. Formerly, when these sites were in the public sector, all costs in relation to a major incident were to be met by the state purse. Now, the new private sector owners will share an element of the costs thus reducing the potential burden to the UK taxpayer.

The “exemption” in the article refers to companies from other countries that are part of the winning consortium and who are potentially exposed in their home courts despite the UK Government picking up costs above the £140 million limit established under the scope of the Nuclear Installations Act. In order to provide those companies with the same level of comfort as that established by law for UK-based companies the UK Government established an indemnity through Parliament.