See also
Web Updates
Bibliography

Radioactive Waste Management
Bibliography
Search for and request publications
related to waste management.
Risk register
The top level risk register below sets out those factors which could impact on our mission to deliver a geological disposal facility for higher activity radioactive waste.
Our Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (RWMD) defines a risk as "an uncertain event which if it did occur could adversely affect our work programme and mission". Examples of such effects are cost, time to implement and the reputation of the project.
These risks do not address the safety of geological disposal, which is addressed in our generic Disposal System Safety Case, or raised issues requiring work in our programme which are managed through our issues process.
See:
Our approach to issues management (2Mb) and
Risk Register for Geological Disposal of Higher Activity Radioactive Waste
The list of risks describes:
- What are the Risks?
- What could the potential Cause be? and
- The Controls we have in place to minimise such risk.
These Control activities by their nature may reduce either the likelihood of the risk occurring, or the impact if it does (or both). Identified causes are assigned 'Control' activities. The Control activities are those that RWMD undertakes in the day-to-day delivery of its work programme. We regularly review risks to ensure all potential events have been captured, assessed and are being appropriately managed. When assessing risks, we record circumstances which may occur as well as their potential impact.
Risk Register for Geological Disposal of Higher Activity Radioactive Waste (200Kb)
| Risk | Cause | Control |
|---|---|---|
|
There is a risk that technical issues affect delivery. |
As a result of site limitations |
|
|
As a result of inventory change |
|
|
|
As a result of changes to regulatory requirements, e.g. changes in dose limits |
|
|
|
There is a risk that insufficient stakeholder support affects delivery. |
As a result of insufficient community support |
|
|
As a result of insufficient regulator support |
|
|
|
As a result of insufficient general stakeholder support |
|
|
|
There is a risk that physical resource affects delivery. |
As a result of unavailability of key equipment/plant for surface-based investigations |
|
|
As a result of external limitations on recruitment |
|
|
|
As a result of internal inability to attract or retain key staff, e.g. competition from other major programmes (e.g. New Nuclear Build).
|
|
|
|
As a result of inability of wider NDA to provide business support to RWMD
|
|
|
|
As a result of commercial issues - lack of suitable suppliers for surface-based investigation due to market constraints.
|
|
|
|
As a result of degradation of historic information records or knowledge |
|
|
|
There is a risk that legal or regulatory challenge affects delivery.
|
As a result of legal challenge |
|
|
As a result of regulatory challenge |
|
|
|
There is a risk that insufficient Government support for the Geological Disposal Facility affects delivery. |
As a result of Government political changes |
|
|
As a result of failure of an overseas Geological Disposal programme |
|
|
|
There is a risk that funding constraints affect delivery. |
As a result of external (to NDA) funding constraints |
|
|
As a result of internal (to NDA) funding constraints |
|
|
|
There is a risk that Health, Safety and Security issues affect delivery. |
As a result of office health, safety and security |
|
|
As a result of Nuclear Health, Safety, Security, Safeguards or construction accident |
|